well in 1917 jp morgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers, to find out how many news organizations it would take to control the policy of the daily press in the united states. they came to the conclusion that they only needed to control 25 of the major papers. they were bought and were soon there after controlled by the council on foreign relations. CFR members include federal bankers, major media moguls, and heads of many other corportations. They shape our news and understanding to further their conquest for world government.
Isn't it kind of silly to throw "media moguls" into your conspiracy about who owns the media? Of course media moguls own the media, because people who become moguls in the business of media are media moguls.
yes. so what? all the same moguls who spread propaganda in this same exact way. and the moguls are the same who founded the federal reserve. and are responsible for knocking down the towers on 9/11 and funding the NAFDA super highway, who have supported eugenics throughout history, who meet every year at the buildeburg conference. yes those moguls.
You can't honest say that the ninny who cobbled together these disparate Fox clips is doing so, so as to prove the power of a Fox Conspiracy to spread faux NEWS??? You've gotta be fucking kidding me!
fox news is owned and operated by the people who crashed the economy to establish the federal reserve. The same people who staged the gulf of tonkin incident to push the u.s. into the vietnam war. and the same people who demolished world trade center buildings one, two and seven, to justify and invasion of the middle east. All of this information is out there for any person to read, it's just easier to make a joke about it. But when they crash the american dollar, and all the money you've saved is worthless, you'll wish you read a little more and told less jokes.
Its always so easy to look at a problem and think that the simplest explaination is in fact a cover up.Cause some fuckin loonies are good at making plausible shit up,does that automatically mean dicksuckers like you need to go about believeing in them.Couldnt be the most obvious answer could it,has to be a big huge conspiracy.And if in fact that said conspiracy were true,what the flippin fuck you going to do about dirtyoldshitbag?NOT A GOD DAMN THING.You are a fuckin idiot and a paranoid one at that.
Herby, please show us the way, wise one. No, wait, sit the fuck down, and shut up... it's our generations turn. Anyone who doesn't believe our own government planned and executed the 9/11 attacks is a GOD DAMN FOOL. Two words: Loose Change. Two more: Cold facts. Herby, I think I speak for all the realists here when I say, open your mind you ignorant, naive fuck.
anywho, i'm on claude's team so i guess that makes +2 the american government didn't stage 9/11 and if you think so you're a wack job listening to terroristic propaganda
a lot of the news in this country fails anyways. every story has a negative implication to it. maybe once in awhile a positive story is covered...but about a dog or some shit. murder drugs death crime war fear...greed. its like they have a list of the deadly sins and check em off to make sure they cover everything.
Hey the news is what it is. You have to have a little gumption and listen to everybody's angle then check the facts out...that's just how it is anymore. But it seems to me that everybody wants to blame fox or nbc for slandering whoever they wanted in office. Nobody wants to admit they're wrong, but both sides are.
Yak I guess you never seen any news outta Scranton PA ever then. Some one gets killed and they are reporting about Nancy Drew's 100th B-Day instead. The news in Scranton news is so shitty! It's real, but not reality.
Hey, Yak, when did you get to be so obtuse? There are lots of stories and they all have FACTS. If the news networks choose to report mainly negative stories instead of positive stories that's a subjective choice, not objective FACTS.
Sabersaw makes a good point, which was made by Michael Moore in his gun documentary. Report only about crime, murder, violence, theft, terror, rape, etc..., keep the population fearful and they are easier to control.
wait no, that wasn't it, murdoch controls television--who purchased the newspapers in the early 1900s? i know someone here knows it. but you are a peach jamiee
The funny part of the gun documentary is that he later admitted that school shootings were the result of drugged up (on prescription antidepressants) kids.
Yeah man, I'm against all these unnecessary pharmceuticals, too. But, are you saying the guns didn't play a part here? We could assume anyone that is going to go on a murder spree has something wrong their brains, like being under the influence of anti-depressants. That craziness AND the easy access to lots of firearms created the shooting situation.
I knew you'd come with that. But, the strength of the weapon is an issue. If strength were no issue, we could easily substitute gun for atom bomb or potato peeler and expect the same results. Of course, the results will be different. Guns make it easier to kill a larger number of people than knives, for instance.
The results aren't different though. Every time they institute more gun control, the results are the same: fewer gun murders, but at least as many murders overall. It might seem that there should be fewer since shooting someone is a simple one-step way to get rid of them, while most other methods are more difficult, but it never works out that way. People will kill just as much, even if it's inconvenient.
I didn't say weapons were equal. I like the idea of guns because they allow smaller people to defend themselves too.
The murder rates only went up in the cases where Canada instituted more gun control, as well as the UK and Australia. These numbers are pretty easy to find online. I'm sure most of them are in posts I made when COTB was still around. There are also numbers for individual states that have put in more gun control, with the same results.
I know of no example where gun control has lowered the murder rate. Admittedly, I haven't checked every country in the world. However, in all the times I've made this argument, no gun control nut has been able to point to a country, state, or city, where it actually lowered the murder rate.
There doesn't need to be any more talking points. Gun control doesn't save lives. Fact.
You're pathetic...that's how he got elected. Over-exposure from the media. Bush may have not been the best(by far), but look at what he got dealt. It was a lose lose scenario, just like Obama got handed to him. You may sit high and mighty now, but his presidency is only 7 days old. You have no right to say that, and when u do, it just shows your ignorance and one-sided ways.
The economy was being propped up by the tech bubble and the beginnings of the housing bubble back then.
No president has the ability to 'fix' the economy because that's now how it works. The president can't grant you eternal life either.
At some point in your life the amount of medical care you require to keep going is too much. What's the point of living if your life is in bed, popping pills, maybe with a machine keeping you going. Better to die then to survive on life support at great costs. We should apply this concept to the economy and just let it die.
...slapping pussies off they bar stools
Cause I off fools and I'm awfully
not carefully unlawful
Cause I cause loose willfully unbrastrapped
no panty, fancy little teens
to lose their jeans and come fucking unraveled
This is the world that I'm living in
Wanko's crapping in his hat, because he doesn't have a tin
Tin soldier, fucking dick smoker
Ya got older like a pig's got pokers
Ya pork fuckers and buttslam berzerkers
Ya got lurkers lurking in yer butthole, yer sluthole, yer 12 nut a night hole
Wickity wha? Wickity wheeze,
Do you gotta fuckin tease?,
I mean I'm sidin' wid you on this thread,
And you runnin with the cheese?
Spread it, share, pass it...don't fast it,
I've earned my motherfuckin fuckin cut,
And without a hint of sleaze.
HAHAHAHA
Progressives..you fuckin cuntbags are so ashamed of owning the term "liberals"..you had to go and start using a more paletable term.How old are you anyway burpwhore? 20-21?
grow the fuck up sonny
And by being a "Liberal", you are by definition a progressive. Has nothing to do with how it sounds, it's how it is. So I tell you Herby, gramps.. just die already.
Comments to Fox Attacks
the same rich bank owners own all the news channels....fact.
the same "rich" guys who own Lehman Brothers??
well in 1917 jp morgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers, to find out how many news organizations it would take to control the policy of the daily press in the united states. they came to the conclusion that they only needed to control 25 of the major papers. they were bought and were soon there after controlled by the council on foreign relations. CFR members include federal bankers, major media moguls, and heads of many other corportations. They shape our news and understanding to further their conquest for world government.
yup
Isn't it kind of silly to throw "media moguls" into your conspiracy about who owns the media? Of course media moguls own the media, because people who become moguls in the business of media are media moguls.
You followin' me, camera guy?
yes. so what? all the same moguls who spread propaganda in this same exact way. and the moguls are the same who founded the federal reserve. and are responsible for knocking down the towers on 9/11 and funding the NAFDA super highway, who have supported eugenics throughout history, who meet every year at the buildeburg conference. yes those moguls.
Haha, I like you, you're funny.
You can't honest say that the ninny who cobbled together these disparate Fox clips is doing so, so as to prove the power of a Fox Conspiracy to spread faux NEWS??? You've gotta be fucking kidding me!
+1 team Claude
It seems to me the person who cobbled this together wanted to show how ridiculous and unnewsworthy Fox news has become
fox news is owned and operated by the people who crashed the economy to establish the federal reserve. The same people who staged the gulf of tonkin incident to push the u.s. into the vietnam war. and the same people who demolished world trade center buildings one, two and seven, to justify and invasion of the middle east. All of this information is out there for any person to read, it's just easier to make a joke about it. But when they crash the american dollar, and all the money you've saved is worthless, you'll wish you read a little more and told less jokes.
I'm not reading all of that.
Haha. That was a joke. Really, I read it.
Its always so easy to look at a problem and think that the simplest explaination is in fact a cover up.Cause some fuckin loonies are good at making plausible shit up,does that automatically mean dicksuckers like you need to go about believeing in them.Couldnt be the most obvious answer could it,has to be a big huge conspiracy.And if in fact that said conspiracy were true,what the flippin fuck you going to do about dirtyoldshitbag?NOT A GOD DAMN THING.You are a fuckin idiot and a paranoid one at that.
yea, news corporation has never had an agenda...
herby, you know nothin about nothin
Herby, please show us the way, wise one. No, wait, sit the fuck down, and shut up... it's our generations turn. Anyone who doesn't believe our own government planned and executed the 9/11 attacks is a GOD DAMN FOOL. Two words: Loose Change. Two more: Cold facts. Herby, I think I speak for all the realists here when I say, open your mind you ignorant, naive fuck.
i watched loose change...there aren't many "cold facts" at all...it's bullshit
Are you serious? It's almost boring cause there are too many facts. The soundtrack makes it tolerable. I'm watching it again right now........
Anyone else watched that shit?
I watched the other one, Tight Bills. It was a big gay conspiracy.
i havnt watched it i guess i dont really give a shit anymore, but of course the government was involved
well, if anyone wants to check it out..
http://www.loosechange911.com/finalcut/
ya thanks for the link
just kidding
wasn't really for you dik.. since you have already watched.
tl;dr
anywho, i'm on claude's team so i guess that makes +2 the american government didn't stage 9/11 and if you think so you're a wack job listening to terroristic propaganda
I say we start by killing Bill O'Reilly
second
Third... and DONE!
Yay!
lol this is funny shit gogo conspiracy theories...
a lot of the news in this country fails anyways. every story has a negative implication to it. maybe once in awhile a positive story is covered...but about a dog or some shit. murder drugs death crime war fear...greed. its like they have a list of the deadly sins and check em off to make sure they cover everything.
you are missing the point about what news is supposed to be... its about REPORTING THE FACTS not giving your own opinions on a story.
Hey the news is what it is. You have to have a little gumption and listen to everybody's angle then check the facts out...that's just how it is anymore. But it seems to me that everybody wants to blame fox or nbc for slandering whoever they wanted in office. Nobody wants to admit they're wrong, but both sides are.
Yak I guess you never seen any news outta Scranton PA ever then. Some one gets killed and they are reporting about Nancy Drew's 100th B-Day instead. The news in Scranton news is so shitty! It's real, but not reality.
the "news" was bought a long time ago. payed for by (fuck i forget who--i'll get back to you on that) but the media is not impartial. not by far.
Rupert Merdoch
Hey, Yak, when did you get to be so obtuse? There are lots of stories and they all have FACTS. If the news networks choose to report mainly negative stories instead of positive stories that's a subjective choice, not objective FACTS.
Sabersaw makes a good point, which was made by Michael Moore in his gun documentary. Report only about crime, murder, violence, theft, terror, rape, etc..., keep the population fearful and they are easier to control.
thank you jaimee, you're a peach
wait no, that wasn't it, murdoch controls television--who purchased the newspapers in the early 1900s? i know someone here knows it. but you are a peach jamiee
Yeah 'cause Michael Moore never uses fear as a tool in his movies to push his democratic point of view.
The funny part of the gun documentary is that he later admitted that school shootings were the result of drugged up (on prescription antidepressants) kids.
Yeah man, I'm against all these unnecessary pharmceuticals, too. But, are you saying the guns didn't play a part here? We could assume anyone that is going to go on a murder spree has something wrong their brains, like being under the influence of anti-depressants. That craziness AND the easy access to lots of firearms created the shooting situation.
It just meant the shooting was a shooting and not a bombing, poisoning, arsoning, or massive-aids-gangbanging.
Can't turn people into killers then blame whatever weapon they happen to use.
I knew you'd come with that. But, the strength of the weapon is an issue. If strength were no issue, we could easily substitute gun for atom bomb or potato peeler and expect the same results. Of course, the results will be different. Guns make it easier to kill a larger number of people than knives, for instance.
The results aren't different though. Every time they institute more gun control, the results are the same: fewer gun murders, but at least as many murders overall. It might seem that there should be fewer since shooting someone is a simple one-step way to get rid of them, while most other methods are more difficult, but it never works out that way. People will kill just as much, even if it's inconvenient.
Wanko they had bombs at Colombine too. Home-made, not bought from the local gun store.
There's a bomb in my pants.
"Every time they institute more gun control, the results are the same: fewer gun murders, but at least as many murders overall."
This is another thing you often say, but I never seen it supported by anything.
* All weapons are equal
* Gun control doesn't (or won't) reduce muder rates
What else is there? The talking points never change.
guns are cool
I like guns, but there should be stricter controls.
fuck that. fuck your dumbass morality and your primitive ideas
I didn't say weapons were equal. I like the idea of guns because they allow smaller people to defend themselves too.
The murder rates only went up in the cases where Canada instituted more gun control, as well as the UK and Australia. These numbers are pretty easy to find online. I'm sure most of them are in posts I made when COTB was still around. There are also numbers for individual states that have put in more gun control, with the same results.
I know of no example where gun control has lowered the murder rate. Admittedly, I haven't checked every country in the world. However, in all the times I've made this argument, no gun control nut has been able to point to a country, state, or city, where it actually lowered the murder rate.
There doesn't need to be any more talking points. Gun control doesn't save lives. Fact.
http://www.fraserinstitute.org/
commerce.web/product_files/
FailedExperimentGunControl.pdf
These guys have the numbers for a few countries and cover the ideas pretty well.
Piss, why are you such a stupid fuck?
What does morality have to do with what I said? What is primitive about my ideas?
As usual, the shit you spout is either irrelevant, ignorant, or half-baked.
I've read a big, long piece about why gun control doesn't work, etc...
I'll check those links later.
Saying "fact" behind something you say does not add any extra credibilty to it and just looks dumb (when you do it seriously).
youre like a little jewish caveman
Wow. Sounds great. Thanks for your input, ElPiss.
It's just one link. I broke it up since Mucho cuts long links off. Fact.
^Fact Nigger
I would pay money to see ann cunter get Nick Berg'd
Isn't it great to have a figurehead the media likes, as opposed to one they don't?
You're pathetic...that's how he got elected. Over-exposure from the media. Bush may have not been the best(by far), but look at what he got dealt. It was a lose lose scenario, just like Obama got handed to him. You may sit high and mighty now, but his presidency is only 7 days old. You have no right to say that, and when u do, it just shows your ignorance and one-sided ways.
We had a surplus in the budget and it was peace time, the economy was doing great; ie: Bush created this debacle
BeerFag, shut the fuck, you simpleton. Rolanda is a right-winger just like yourself.
The economy was being propped up by the tech bubble and the beginnings of the housing bubble back then.
No president has the ability to 'fix' the economy because that's now how it works. The president can't grant you eternal life either.
At some point in your life the amount of medical care you require to keep going is too much. What's the point of living if your life is in bed, popping pills, maybe with a machine keeping you going. Better to die then to survive on life support at great costs. We should apply this concept to the economy and just let it die.
Boooooorrrrrrrrrrring.
Right winger? Not so, Hanky... not so.
Hank...Fail.
QueerMan, you haven't even been here long enough to mention my name.
Hank
I'm so tempted to start rapping.
*crapping
...slapping pussies off they bar stools
Cause I off fools and I'm awfully
not carefully unlawful
Cause I cause loose willfully unbrastrapped
no panty, fancy little teens
to lose their jeans and come fucking unraveled
This is the world that I'm living in
Wanko's crapping in his hat, because he doesn't have a tin
Tin soldier, fucking dick smoker
Ya got older like a pig's got pokers
Ya pork fuckers and buttslam berzerkers
Ya got lurkers lurking in yer butthole, yer sluthole, yer 12 nut a night hole
I have nothing to add...except this is the part where you walk your broken ass home Wanko. Kick rocks son.
Fuck off you crossdresser. You made me read half that shit to see what it said about me.
Let me summarise...you's a tool in Hank's eyes,
A cheap disguise,
Foolin no-one's eyes.
His size of rhymes
is like a dozen meat pies
filled with live flies
No fleas or please
He tries trees on his knees
Wickity wha? Wickity wheeze,
Do you gotta fuckin tease?,
I mean I'm sidin' wid you on this thread,
And you runnin with the cheese?
Spread it, share, pass it...don't fast it,
I've earned my motherfuckin fuckin cut,
And without a hint of sleaze.
I was talking about Spanko.
Let's kill the rapping for a bit, eh?
Plus, I pwned you.
Not in this thread. The other one.
Yes! Thank Christ. I was getting very tired. I'll offer you a draw...and that's generous ChinNasty.
Yeah right. I outdid you every thread.
Let's have a show of hands.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah... Fucking pansy crybaby Republicans! You lost bitches! Deal with it!!!
I am trying to deal with it but man its tough..i want to put a pistol to my head and end this pain.
Please do.
I can help provide a pistol for ya Herby... You know progressives are all about euthanasia....
HAHAHAHA
Progressives..you fuckin cuntbags are so ashamed of owning the term "liberals"..you had to go and start using a more paletable term.How old are you anyway burpwhore? 20-21?
grow the fuck up sonny
I use the term liberal quite often to describe myself, fag.
I'm 25 Herby... how old are you, like 50? Clearly out of touch with modern times.. its sad really.
And by being a "Liberal", you are by definition a progressive. Has nothing to do with how it sounds, it's how it is. So I tell you Herby, gramps.. just die already.
Just call yourselves "pussies" and be done with it.
I'd rather call you a pussy, pussy.
I prefer the term "spineless" thank you very much....