Muchologo
contact | faq |

Fox Attacks

Right wingers are grasping at straws

Fox Attacks

tags related to Fox Attacks

fox news,  politics,  fox

Comments to Fox Attacks

  • j0sh8790
    j0sh8790 2009-01-27T05:11:19Z says:

    the same rich bank owners own all the news channels....fact.

    • MetalFace
      MetalFace 2009-01-27T06:25:58Z says:

      the same "rich" guys who own Lehman Brothers??

    • olddirtybastard
      olddirtybastard 2009-01-27T13:31:39Z says:

      well in 1917 jp morgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers, to find out how many news organizations it would take to control the policy of the daily press in the united states. they came to the conclusion that they only needed to control 25 of the major papers. they were bought and were soon there after controlled by the council on foreign relations. CFR members include federal bankers, major media moguls, and heads of many other corportations. They shape our news and understanding to further their conquest for world government.

    • j0sh8790
      j0sh8790 2009-01-27T18:04:09Z says:

      yup

    • fantastick
      fantastick 2009-01-28T06:12:39Z says:

      Isn't it kind of silly to throw "media moguls" into your conspiracy about who owns the media? Of course media moguls own the media, because people who become moguls in the business of media are media moguls.

      You followin' me, camera guy?

    • j0sh8790
      j0sh8790 2009-01-28T08:23:26Z says:

      yes. so what? all the same moguls who spread propaganda in this same exact way. and the moguls are the same who founded the federal reserve. and are responsible for knocking down the towers on 9/11 and funding the NAFDA super highway, who have supported eugenics throughout history, who meet every year at the buildeburg conference. yes those moguls.

    • fantastick
      fantastick 2009-02-19T09:22:38Z says:

      Haha, I like you, you're funny.

  • ClaudeBallz
    ClaudeBallz 2009-01-27T05:36:19Z says:

    You can't honest say that the ninny who cobbled together these disparate Fox clips is doing so, so as to prove the power of a Fox Conspiracy to spread faux NEWS??? You've gotta be fucking kidding me!

    • beermanold33
      beermanold33 2009-01-27T06:08:13Z says:

      +1 team Claude

    • jamiee1869
      jamiee1869 2009-01-27T12:11:27Z says:

      It seems to me the person who cobbled this together wanted to show how ridiculous and unnewsworthy Fox news has become

    • olddirtybastard
      olddirtybastard 2009-01-27T13:49:21Z says:

      fox news is owned and operated by the people who crashed the economy to establish the federal reserve. The same people who staged the gulf of tonkin incident to push the u.s. into the vietnam war. and the same people who demolished world trade center buildings one, two and seven, to justify and invasion of the middle east. All of this information is out there for any person to read, it's just easier to make a joke about it. But when they crash the american dollar, and all the money you've saved is worthless, you'll wish you read a little more and told less jokes.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T15:02:08Z says:

      I'm not reading all of that.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T15:02:57Z says:

      Haha. That was a joke. Really, I read it.

    • HerbyVerstinks
      HerbyVerstinks 2009-01-27T22:39:25Z says:

      Its always so easy to look at a problem and think that the simplest explaination is in fact a cover up.Cause some fuckin loonies are good at making plausible shit up,does that automatically mean dicksuckers like you need to go about believeing in them.Couldnt be the most obvious answer could it,has to be a big huge conspiracy.And if in fact that said conspiracy were true,what the flippin fuck you going to do about dirtyoldshitbag?NOT A GOD DAMN THING.You are a fuckin idiot and a paranoid one at that.

    • elchris
      elchris 2009-01-27T23:26:17Z says:

      yea, news corporation has never had an agenda...

    • elchris
      elchris 2009-01-27T23:27:14Z says:

      herby, you know nothin about nothin

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-27T23:31:55Z says:

      Herby, please show us the way, wise one. No, wait, sit the fuck down, and shut up... it's our generations turn. Anyone who doesn't believe our own government planned and executed the 9/11 attacks is a GOD DAMN FOOL. Two words: Loose Change. Two more: Cold facts. Herby, I think I speak for all the realists here when I say, open your mind you ignorant, naive fuck.

    • dik
      dik 2009-01-27T23:42:23Z says:

      i watched loose change...there aren't many "cold facts" at all...it's bullshit

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-27T23:45:10Z says:

      Are you serious? It's almost boring cause there are too many facts. The soundtrack makes it tolerable. I'm watching it again right now........

      Anyone else watched that shit?

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T23:52:40Z says:

      I watched the other one, Tight Bills. It was a big gay conspiracy.

    • elchris
      elchris 2009-01-27T23:53:34Z says:

      i havnt watched it i guess i dont really give a shit anymore, but of course the government was involved

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-27T23:55:53Z says:

      well, if anyone wants to check it out..
      http://www.loosechange911.com/finalcut/

    • dik
      dik 2009-01-27T23:59:46Z says:

      ya thanks for the link

    • dik
      dik 2009-01-27T23:59:53Z says:

      just kidding

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-28T00:02:31Z says:

      wasn't really for you dik.. since you have already watched.

    • BodyByMucho
      BodyByMucho 2009-01-28T06:37:37Z says:

      tl;dr

    • theforgotten
      theforgotten 2009-02-05T01:27:56Z says:

      anywho, i'm on claude's team so i guess that makes +2 the american government didn't stage 9/11 and if you think so you're a wack job listening to terroristic propaganda

  • PatrickBateman
    PatrickBateman 2009-01-27T05:38:26Z says:

    I say we start by killing Bill O'Reilly

  • MrSneaky
    MrSneaky 2009-01-27T06:04:47Z says:

    lol this is funny shit gogo conspiracy theories...

  • sabersaw5611
    sabersaw5611 2009-01-27T06:46:39Z says:

    a lot of the news in this country fails anyways. every story has a negative implication to it. maybe once in awhile a positive story is covered...but about a dog or some shit. murder drugs death crime war fear...greed. its like they have a list of the deadly sins and check em off to make sure they cover everything.

    • yak
      yak 2009-01-27T06:52:21Z says:

      you are missing the point about what news is supposed to be... its about REPORTING THE FACTS not giving your own opinions on a story.

    • beermanold33
      beermanold33 2009-01-27T07:03:26Z says:

      Hey the news is what it is. You have to have a little gumption and listen to everybody's angle then check the facts out...that's just how it is anymore. But it seems to me that everybody wants to blame fox or nbc for slandering whoever they wanted in office. Nobody wants to admit they're wrong, but both sides are.

    • markiemark
      markiemark 2009-01-27T08:57:12Z says:

      Yak I guess you never seen any news outta Scranton PA ever then. Some one gets killed and they are reporting about Nancy Drew's 100th B-Day instead. The news in Scranton news is so shitty! It's real, but not reality.

    • xzekiel
      xzekiel 2009-01-27T11:54:04Z says:

      the "news" was bought a long time ago. payed for by (fuck i forget who--i'll get back to you on that) but the media is not impartial. not by far.

    • jamiee1869
      jamiee1869 2009-01-27T12:13:47Z says:

      Rupert Merdoch

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T12:34:13Z says:

      Hey, Yak, when did you get to be so obtuse? There are lots of stories and they all have FACTS. If the news networks choose to report mainly negative stories instead of positive stories that's a subjective choice, not objective FACTS.

      Sabersaw makes a good point, which was made by Michael Moore in his gun documentary. Report only about crime, murder, violence, theft, terror, rape, etc..., keep the population fearful and they are easier to control.

    • xzekiel
      xzekiel 2009-01-27T12:48:16Z says:

      thank you jaimee, you're a peach

    • xzekiel
      xzekiel 2009-01-27T12:56:25Z says:

      wait no, that wasn't it, murdoch controls television--who purchased the newspapers in the early 1900s? i know someone here knows it. but you are a peach jamiee

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-27T12:57:05Z says:

      Yeah 'cause Michael Moore never uses fear as a tool in his movies to push his democratic point of view.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-27T13:00:08Z says:

      The funny part of the gun documentary is that he later admitted that school shootings were the result of drugged up (on prescription antidepressants) kids.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T15:09:37Z says:

      Yeah man, I'm against all these unnecessary pharmceuticals, too. But, are you saying the guns didn't play a part here? We could assume anyone that is going to go on a murder spree has something wrong their brains, like being under the influence of anti-depressants. That craziness AND the easy access to lots of firearms created the shooting situation.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-27T15:18:32Z says:

      It just meant the shooting was a shooting and not a bombing, poisoning, arsoning, or massive-aids-gangbanging.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-27T15:19:16Z says:

      Can't turn people into killers then blame whatever weapon they happen to use.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T15:26:54Z says:

      I knew you'd come with that. But, the strength of the weapon is an issue. If strength were no issue, we could easily substitute gun for atom bomb or potato peeler and expect the same results. Of course, the results will be different. Guns make it easier to kill a larger number of people than knives, for instance.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-27T18:06:09Z says:

      The results aren't different though. Every time they institute more gun control, the results are the same: fewer gun murders, but at least as many murders overall. It might seem that there should be fewer since shooting someone is a simple one-step way to get rid of them, while most other methods are more difficult, but it never works out that way. People will kill just as much, even if it's inconvenient.

    • beermanold33
      beermanold33 2009-01-27T18:33:09Z says:

      Wanko they had bombs at Colombine too. Home-made, not bought from the local gun store.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-27T19:36:57Z says:

      There's a bomb in my pants.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T23:20:49Z says:

      "Every time they institute more gun control, the results are the same: fewer gun murders, but at least as many murders overall."

      This is another thing you often say, but I never seen it supported by anything.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T23:22:29Z says:

      * All weapons are equal
      * Gun control doesn't (or won't) reduce muder rates

      What else is there? The talking points never change.

    • elchris
      elchris 2009-01-27T23:31:12Z says:

      guns are cool

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T23:48:42Z says:

      I like guns, but there should be stricter controls.

    • elchris
      elchris 2009-01-28T00:18:06Z says:

      fuck that. fuck your dumbass morality and your primitive ideas

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-28T00:31:59Z says:

      I didn't say weapons were equal. I like the idea of guns because they allow smaller people to defend themselves too.

      The murder rates only went up in the cases where Canada instituted more gun control, as well as the UK and Australia. These numbers are pretty easy to find online. I'm sure most of them are in posts I made when COTB was still around. There are also numbers for individual states that have put in more gun control, with the same results.

      I know of no example where gun control has lowered the murder rate. Admittedly, I haven't checked every country in the world. However, in all the times I've made this argument, no gun control nut has been able to point to a country, state, or city, where it actually lowered the murder rate.

      There doesn't need to be any more talking points. Gun control doesn't save lives. Fact.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-28T00:33:40Z says:

      http://www.fraserinstitute.org/
      commerce.web/product_files/
      FailedExperimentGunControl.pdf

      These guys have the numbers for a few countries and cover the ideas pretty well.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T02:33:23Z says:

      Piss, why are you such a stupid fuck?

      What does morality have to do with what I said? What is primitive about my ideas?

      As usual, the shit you spout is either irrelevant, ignorant, or half-baked.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T02:34:28Z says:

      I've read a big, long piece about why gun control doesn't work, etc...

      I'll check those links later.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T02:37:01Z says:

      Saying "fact" behind something you say does not add any extra credibilty to it and just looks dumb (when you do it seriously).

    • elchris
      elchris 2009-01-28T02:44:19Z says:

      youre like a little jewish caveman

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T03:50:52Z says:

      Wow. Sounds great. Thanks for your input, ElPiss.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-28T14:36:06Z says:

      It's just one link. I broke it up since Mucho cuts long links off. Fact.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T14:51:35Z says:

      ^Fact Nigger

  • RandyWatson
    RandyWatson 2009-01-27T07:11:19Z says:

    I would pay money to see ann cunter get Nick Berg'd

  • Rolandofgilead
    Rolandofgilead 2009-01-27T08:26:54Z says:

    Isn't it great to have a figurehead the media likes, as opposed to one they don't?

    • beermanold33
      beermanold33 2009-01-27T08:33:41Z says:

      You're pathetic...that's how he got elected. Over-exposure from the media. Bush may have not been the best(by far), but look at what he got dealt. It was a lose lose scenario, just like Obama got handed to him. You may sit high and mighty now, but his presidency is only 7 days old. You have no right to say that, and when u do, it just shows your ignorance and one-sided ways.

    • jamiee1869
      jamiee1869 2009-01-27T12:17:47Z says:

      We had a surplus in the budget and it was peace time, the economy was doing great; ie: Bush created this debacle

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T12:36:10Z says:

      BeerFag, shut the fuck, you simpleton. Rolanda is a right-winger just like yourself.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-27T12:54:16Z says:

      The economy was being propped up by the tech bubble and the beginnings of the housing bubble back then.

      No president has the ability to 'fix' the economy because that's now how it works. The president can't grant you eternal life either.

      At some point in your life the amount of medical care you require to keep going is too much. What's the point of living if your life is in bed, popping pills, maybe with a machine keeping you going. Better to die then to survive on life support at great costs. We should apply this concept to the economy and just let it die.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T23:56:38Z says:

      Boooooorrrrrrrrrrring.

    • Rolandofgilead
      Rolandofgilead 2009-01-28T07:48:26Z says:

      Right winger? Not so, Hanky... not so.

    • beermanold33
      beermanold33 2009-01-28T08:01:21Z says:

      Hank...Fail.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T08:44:34Z says:

      QueerMan, you haven't even been here long enough to mention my name.

    • beermanold33
      beermanold33 2009-01-28T08:52:01Z says:

      Hank

    • CruelHM
      CruelHM 2009-01-28T08:52:34Z says:

      I'm so tempted to start rapping.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-28T14:37:32Z says:

      *crapping

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T15:09:15Z says:

      ...slapping pussies off they bar stools
      Cause I off fools and I'm awfully
      not carefully unlawful
      Cause I cause loose willfully unbrastrapped
      no panty, fancy little teens
      to lose their jeans and come fucking unraveled
      This is the world that I'm living in
      Wanko's crapping in his hat, because he doesn't have a tin
      Tin soldier, fucking dick smoker
      Ya got older like a pig's got pokers
      Ya pork fuckers and buttslam berzerkers
      Ya got lurkers lurking in yer butthole, yer sluthole, yer 12 nut a night hole

    • CruelHM
      CruelHM 2009-01-28T15:29:41Z says:

      I have nothing to add...except this is the part where you walk your broken ass home Wanko. Kick rocks son.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-28T15:55:32Z says:

      Fuck off you crossdresser. You made me read half that shit to see what it said about me.

    • CruelHM
      CruelHM 2009-01-28T16:35:51Z says:

      Let me summarise...you's a tool in Hank's eyes,
      A cheap disguise,
      Foolin no-one's eyes.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T16:54:13Z says:

      His size of rhymes
      is like a dozen meat pies
      filled with live flies
      No fleas or please
      He tries trees on his knees

    • CruelHM
      CruelHM 2009-01-28T16:59:57Z says:

      Wickity wha? Wickity wheeze,
      Do you gotta fuckin tease?,
      I mean I'm sidin' wid you on this thread,
      And you runnin with the cheese?
      Spread it, share, pass it...don't fast it,
      I've earned my motherfuckin fuckin cut,
      And without a hint of sleaze.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T17:05:42Z says:

      I was talking about Spanko.

      Let's kill the rapping for a bit, eh?

      Plus, I pwned you.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T17:06:29Z says:

      Not in this thread. The other one.

    • CruelHM
      CruelHM 2009-01-28T17:09:06Z says:

      Yes! Thank Christ. I was getting very tired. I'll offer you a draw...and that's generous ChinNasty.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T17:28:11Z says:

      Yeah right. I outdid you every thread.

      Let's have a show of hands.

  • HypoLuxaHermesPan
    HypoLuxaHermesPan 2009-01-27T09:34:46Z says:

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah... Fucking pansy crybaby Republicans! You lost bitches! Deal with it!!!

    • HerbyVerstinks
      HerbyVerstinks 2009-01-27T22:46:33Z says:

      I am trying to deal with it but man its tough..i want to put a pistol to my head and end this pain.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-27T23:55:59Z says:

      Please do.

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-28T00:08:48Z says:

      I can help provide a pistol for ya Herby... You know progressives are all about euthanasia....

    • HerbyVerstinks
      HerbyVerstinks 2009-01-28T00:38:14Z says:

      HAHAHAHA
      Progressives..you fuckin cuntbags are so ashamed of owning the term "liberals"..you had to go and start using a more paletable term.How old are you anyway burpwhore? 20-21?
      grow the fuck up sonny

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T03:52:04Z says:

      I use the term liberal quite often to describe myself, fag.

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-28T04:43:44Z says:

      I'm 25 Herby... how old are you, like 50? Clearly out of touch with modern times.. its sad really.

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-28T04:48:14Z says:

      And by being a "Liberal", you are by definition a progressive. Has nothing to do with how it sounds, it's how it is. So I tell you Herby, gramps.. just die already.

    • El_Wanko
      El_Wanko 2009-01-28T14:38:39Z says:

      Just call yourselves "pussies" and be done with it.

    • HankChinaski
      HankChinaski 2009-01-28T16:20:25Z says:

      I'd rather call you a pussy, pussy.

    • JerkStore
      JerkStore 2009-01-28T18:58:30Z says:

      I prefer the term "spineless" thank you very much....

jamiee1869
posted January 27, 2009

Recent Searches

more »