like it would actually be harder to find 300 mexicans to run around with swords for under minimum wage rather then pay amercian cg artist top dollor to animate them...
The animation looks amazing and yet at the same time... something seems not right about it. Like it should look more realistic than it does. They should've just done it live-action, but looks pretty awesome nonetheless.
I was thinking, If they're going to make the actors look like themselves, why not shoot it live action and add CGI after? It doesn't make much sense other than to say, "we did it first."
Polar Express looks fake. Spirits Within looks fake. Advent Children looks fake. Killzone 2 looks fake. they might as well resort back to good ol' clay animation.
hmmm i remember reading beowulf... heh heh heh that poem was fucking LONG! other than that it was a great story and full of blood.... but i have to admit... 13th warrior is a nice rendition of it
i think its going to be similar to sin city and such but with much more cg processing on the characters... i think its going to be kind of a weird cg overlay by the looks of it.. cuz those "people" were definately cg
So Hollywood has rediscovered the sword and sandal epic, big fucking deal. Go back and watch the silent version of Ben Hur where they didn't have some pussy CGI to make them look good and crowds were made with puppets.
Comments to Pretty real looking all CGI movie
and still..some how..bicho gave head to every one on set.
Her determination when it comes to BJs is astounding.
Looks like it might be an ok movie...300 was mainly cgi and it turned out cool
300 Mexicans was CGI?
yea, but it was done at half the cost of regular CGI....
You can barely tell the difference in quality.
like it would actually be harder to find 300 mexicans to run around with swords for under minimum wage rather then pay amercian cg artist top dollor to animate them...
ah the great king beowulf. i cant wait to see the dragon kill him!
If I remember the poem correctly, Beowulf wasn't a king.
i still think beowulf and grenwald or whatever was a kick ass movie.
The animation looks amazing and yet at the same time... something seems not right about it. Like it should look more realistic than it does. They should've just done it live-action, but looks pretty awesome nonetheless.
I was thinking, If they're going to make the actors look like themselves, why not shoot it live action and add CGI after? It doesn't make much sense other than to say, "we did it first."
There was more CGI in lord of the rings than this movie
why didnt the actors just act? instead of just phoning it in?
Polar Express looks fake. Spirits Within looks fake. Advent Children looks fake. Killzone 2 looks fake. they might as well resort back to good ol' clay animation.
I remember the Beowulf story being pretty average. But then I never read the original poem. Also, Ray Winstone is an odd choice for Beowulf.
The poem made him seem pretty bad ass, but I think this will be completely shit.
hmmm i remember reading beowulf... heh heh heh that poem was fucking LONG! other than that it was a great story and full of blood.... but i have to admit... 13th warrior is a nice rendition of it
13th Warrior was based on a book by Michael Crichten.
Ooo Beowolf....I like that Angelina Jolie is in this movie...I'd do her....
I'd pay a lot more to see that than I would to see this movie.
....Archman faints.
Loss of blood to his brain.
just thinking of it makes me fap!
um..so? id rather see you get fucked by a bull dyke who would abuse your ass with a strap on, and spit in your mouth.
i bet the first beowulf movie with that mortal combat guy Raiden is far more better. Angelina jolie is very hot .
No... God no! That movie sucked monkey balls!
yes god yes...it was awesome.
It's filmed using "digitally enhanced live action". This means you don't see Ray Winstones beer belly but you do see Angelina Jolies enhanced norks.
Ray Winstone would kick your ass with a beer belly or not . He's the fucking nuts....
I didn't say he was soft fries, just that his beer belly has been removed. I mean, have you seen Sexy Beast?
Christ, that looks like it's going to suck. Just fucking suck.
I hope not but I fear you may be right mate.
i might dish out the fifteen bucks to watch this.
$15?! I only pay $16 for two people... or free if i download :P heh
matinee :P
then you can take like 4 people for the price of 1 normal ticket ;/
Student discount, bitches! I kept my school ID for a reason.
Um, it's about "all CGI" as 300 was. Which is to say, not at all.
been a while since zemeckis directed something worth watching... lookin forward to this
Not since the Back to the Future trilogy, right?
so this movie is all cgi with those actors with that director?? sounds interesting for sure
i think its going to be similar to sin city and such but with much more cg processing on the characters... i think its going to be kind of a weird cg overlay by the looks of it.. cuz those "people" were definately cg
So Hollywood has rediscovered the sword and sandal epic, big fucking deal. Go back and watch the silent version of Ben Hur where they didn't have some pussy CGI to make them look good and crowds were made with puppets.
sounds ...well just godamned silly
Do they only have that one tune to use for sword-swinging movietrailers nowadays?
hey, at least they didn't use Don LaFontaine to narrate the trailer... that's a first.
actors will still be needed, to copy into the cgi movie...kind of redundant..