Firstly, that website has far too many naked kids!
Still, I'm going with: Porn. Genre = Nudist. It mixes real nudist pictures with clearly staged shoots.
Now lets break down the demographics of the websites audience...
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/purenudism.com
Age) Almost entirely 18-24 & 55-64
Education: Some college
Gender: Male
Have children: No
Browsing Location: Home
So the visitors to that site are both pretty young/pretty old men with no children who look at the website at home. Strange that, considering that the website seems to portray nudism as a pastime enjoyed by families.
how stupid of me to post the site name. i can not take it back and it bothers me. i am not into child porn and did not see this site as even sexually interesting. i remenbered the guy in it andand didn't think before i acted. i have asked mucho to pull the address with no availe i am leaving this site and should be banned for life. sorry to every one.
oj, just watched the inbetweeners episode where they watch "2 girls 1 cup", heard the first sec of the music and could not stop laughing. the boys would be great mucho'ers, don't you think?
Seems to me that site was about nudism. The people in the pics were almost all adults. Only a few kids. I suppose they should hide the kids when the camera comes out.
It also seems like English are super paranoid about pedos, like there is a pedo lurking behind every tree.
What nudism website, that isn't actually a niche porn site, would charge to look at pictures? What nudists would pay to look at those pictures?
You know what websites do charge people to look at picture of naked people? That's right, porn sites.
The law on pictures of naked children is pretty tight, but you market it is a nudism site & all is well.
Look at the fucking demographics of the visitors to that site. Does that fucking look like anything other than the exact same audience you'd get from any other porn site to you?
"Oh it says nudist site & my brother is a nudist, therefore it must be OK" Get fucking real.
You have spent enough time on here telling people to look past the bullshit to see what is really there, but you're falling hook line and bastard sinker for their poor excuse of legitimacy.
I just looked at the site and it looked like a bunch of dirty naked hippies to me. Hardly anything to fap about. I also wondered why in the weightroom pic they picked the fatest chick they had to pose with exercise equipment.
You think 18-24 & 55-64 (males, with no children) are the prime ages for porn browsing?
Fucking YEAH!
Do you people know ANYTHING about marketing? Segmentation, targeting & positioning? That is why I tried to make it very fucking simple earlier, I broke it all down.
You may think it is boring, but that is because companies don't sell that same shit to everyone. You aren't the people they want to join their site. It's the Garry Glitters of this world who they are targeting with that site.
*Hey come here, we have pictures of really hot young women....and some kids. We are a nudist site, so it is OK to pay a monthly subscription fee*
Its $29.95 a fucking month!!!!
Why would any real nudists pay that for pictures when they do it all the time?
Have you even looked at the shit they sell?
Teen Jr Beauty Pageant Contests. ONLY $3.95
'cause that isn't aimed at paedophiles, is it.
Oh, and look at this disclaimer:
Should there be any visual depictions displayed on this Website of actual sexually explicit conduct, such models, actors, actresses and other persons appearing or otherwise contained in this Website were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions.
It is far from a legitimate nudist site, if you can't see that you're fucking retarded. No ifs, ands or buts, just fucking retarded.
Steven, I started to watch that link you gave me yesterday. I watched the first one & loaded up the other 5 part to watch tonight. I'll let you know what I think when I have seen it all, but as of now, he seems funny & pretty smart. Nothing like the generic comedians we're all bored of.
I don't think Hank or Irish have ever heard of voyeurism. They seem to be under the impression that since it is just pictures of naked kids walking around and playing on all fours, instead of being fucked, it isn't something paedophiles would spend $29.95 a fucking month on.
You are really into this site, Oranje. Did you think $29.95 was too much to pay or something? Just because you got excited and touched yourself to the pictures of the little kids doesn't make it porn, you sick fuck.
Comments to Sauna
He's probably gay
loves the cock
he is totally checking out that chicks tits, I am going to go with not gay.
no boner = Gay
i think you're all gay for talking about the naked guy when theres 9 or 10 naked girls in a sauna.
how many?
10
Its a chick with a goatee
Dibs
But it has a penis.
double dibs
doesn't mean much on this site
I'll take the three on the right.
The one on his left looks particulary hot
all you take is your own hand up yer ass
I'd really like to know the backstory on this pic. I don't have a clue.
it,s a nudist colony (nudism)
its a staged nudist colony for an artsy porno shoot
Firstly, that website has far too many naked kids!
Still, I'm going with: Porn. Genre = Nudist. It mixes real nudist pictures with clearly staged shoots.
Now lets break down the demographics of the websites audience...
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/purenudism.com
Age) Almost entirely 18-24 & 55-64
Education: Some college
Gender: Male
Have children: No
Browsing Location: Home
So the visitors to that site are both pretty young/pretty old men with no children who look at the website at home. Strange that, considering that the website seems to portray nudism as a pastime enjoyed by families.
ITS PORN, YOU FUCKING MORON!!!
Nothing wrong with pictures of naked kids.
My brother is a nudist. He says it's all older people at nudist camps.
I was a nude model for drawing class at my uni.
The nudist camp on that website is full of naked kids.
That nudist camp is a porn set.
A porn set pandering to the fantasies of paedos.
Paedos ? are you for real ?
What the fuck do you not understand?
It is a porn set.
They put the pics on the internet.
There are numerous naked children.
I posted a breakdown of the demographics of the visitors to that site.
It's quite clearly a site which sidesteps the law, & 'panders to the fantasies of paedophiles'.
Yes, I'm for fucking real.
God you're fucking stupid.
Read the fucking thread before posting more stupid shit.
So......let me get this straight. It's a porn set? Right?
Joking!
nudism rules! viva la prerow!
nobody'll get that one, naggo!
how stupid of me to post the site name. i can not take it back and it bothers me. i am not into child porn and did not see this site as even sexually interesting. i remenbered the guy in it andand didn't think before i acted. i have asked mucho to pull the address with no availe i am leaving this site and should be banned for life. sorry to every one.
christ on a fucking stick... who fucking cares about other sites. why are you making this such a big fucking deal orangeboom?
deja, why didn't you post my awesome gif submissions?
uh, cause you didn't fucking submit them before i did mucho today?
okay, sorry.
but damn, you're alot faster than yak,
i submitted the vid even later.
Because "it's quite clearly a site which sidesteps the law, & 'panders to the fantasies of paedophiles'"
oj, just watched the inbetweeners episode where they watch "2 girls 1 cup", heard the first sec of the music and could not stop laughing. the boys would be great mucho'ers, don't you think?
and yeah, the fishing thing was just hilarious.
Seems to me that site was about nudism. The people in the pics were almost all adults. Only a few kids. I suppose they should hide the kids when the camera comes out.
It also seems like English are super paranoid about pedos, like there is a pedo lurking behind every tree.
Are you retarded?
What nudism website, that isn't actually a niche porn site, would charge to look at pictures? What nudists would pay to look at those pictures?
You know what websites do charge people to look at picture of naked people? That's right, porn sites.
The law on pictures of naked children is pretty tight, but you market it is a nudism site & all is well.
Look at the fucking demographics of the visitors to that site. Does that fucking look like anything other than the exact same audience you'd get from any other porn site to you?
"Oh it says nudist site & my brother is a nudist, therefore it must be OK" Get fucking real.
You have spent enough time on here telling people to look past the bullshit to see what is really there, but you're falling hook line and bastard sinker for their poor excuse of legitimacy.
Oranje is a fag.
Steven, they would fit in perfectly. Most people as as full of shit as Jay anyway.
^^ Case in point.
You think 18-24 & 55-64 are the prime ages for porn browsing? Or is that just for pedo porn browsing? Wtf?
Also, are you saying that if it was free then it would probably be a real nudist site and not some pedo scam? Don't follow you there at all.
LOOK, A PEDO IS STANDING RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!!
It's just the pictures of nude children getting you all worked up.
Doesn't seem too sinister to me.
on here? hell yes, most are even worse, i suppose. you gotten around to checking out demetri yet? do it soon, you won't be disappointed.
i should stop interposting on your flirts all the time, oj, sorry.
I just looked at the site and it looked like a bunch of dirty naked hippies to me. Hardly anything to fap about. I also wondered why in the weightroom pic they picked the fatest chick they had to pose with exercise equipment.
Seriously, it's some boring shit.
You think 18-24 & 55-64 (males, with no children) are the prime ages for porn browsing?
Fucking YEAH!
Do you people know ANYTHING about marketing? Segmentation, targeting & positioning? That is why I tried to make it very fucking simple earlier, I broke it all down.
You may think it is boring, but that is because companies don't sell that same shit to everyone. You aren't the people they want to join their site. It's the Garry Glitters of this world who they are targeting with that site.
*Hey come here, we have pictures of really hot young women....and some kids. We are a nudist site, so it is OK to pay a monthly subscription fee*
Its $29.95 a fucking month!!!!
Why would any real nudists pay that for pictures when they do it all the time?
Have you even looked at the shit they sell?
Teen Jr Beauty Pageant Contests. ONLY $3.95
'cause that isn't aimed at paedophiles, is it.
Oh, and look at this disclaimer:
Should there be any visual depictions displayed on this Website of actual sexually explicit conduct, such models, actors, actresses and other persons appearing or otherwise contained in this Website were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions.
It is far from a legitimate nudist site, if you can't see that you're fucking retarded. No ifs, ands or buts, just fucking retarded.
Steven, I started to watch that link you gave me yesterday. I watched the first one & loaded up the other 5 part to watch tonight. I'll let you know what I think when I have seen it all, but as of now, he seems funny & pretty smart. Nothing like the generic comedians we're all bored of.
yep. pedo porn.
I don't think Hank or Irish have ever heard of voyeurism. They seem to be under the impression that since it is just pictures of naked kids walking around and playing on all fours, instead of being fucked, it isn't something paedophiles would spend $29.95 a fucking month on.
FYI, voyeurism.
A person who derives sexual gratification from observing the naked bodies or sexual acts of others, especially from a secret vantage point.
You are really into this site, Oranje. Did you think $29.95 was too much to pay or something? Just because you got excited and touched yourself to the pictures of the little kids doesn't make it porn, you sick fuck.
From everything I have said, that is what you understand from it?
Genius!
Don't talk to me anymore. I don't want to be associated with anyone like you.
thats funny 1rish1 as you clearly tempted Oranje into talking to you by calling him a 'fag'
No, fries.
I can live happily without having to slum it by talking to him. Lets just hope that he can keep his dumb comments away from me.
I'm gonna tell Harriet Harman about that site, then she can have it closed down.
What a retard. Since when are 18-24 & 55-64 the prime ages for porn browsing? That's just fucking stupid.
Like I said. Fucking English think everything is fucking pedos.
Everyone's a pedo to these dumbasses.
I guess if your a pedo you go into remission from the ages 24 - 55.
I don't consider him lucky unless he's boning them. Cause it seems like this fucker is just gonna get blue balls here so that's not really lucky.
Still, he must have enjoyed that
its like a buffet
Having E.D. is NOT lucky
Far right, 2 from the right. 2, 4 and 5 from the left
*5 from the right. 7 from the left
Youth IS wasted on the wrong people...
They are all ugly apart from the 4th from right
You're ugly no matter where you are sitting.
There's something seriously weird going on with the 3rd and 4th from the left. Is one of them missing a fucking leg?
Only in Finland
time to buy a sauna....
Does that one chick in the middle have a beard?!