No, you're the poor one remember nerdbot. Isn't that right Rish? And Claude. Yes, you are a pussy, but I'll still fuck you up, and make you cough up pube balls for days.
Yeah...I heard they make adult diapers too...go get some Mr Poopypants. Jesus. Yak shoulda banned you too for being the biggest pussy on Earth. You bring shame on Mucho by your presence here.
Actually...it's 'pompous'. I would proffer that he's not what you suggest, but, paradoxically, you are rather ill-educated, and quite dull of mind.
Pompus? I appreciate the Freudian slippage that went into that - since Aussie bastards refer to us as 'poms' and the infected emanation on a Brit's face would indeed amount to 'pom pus'.
Your 'knowing' what you feel. As I said before, you are the only one who is annoyed by its usage. But, as I say again, it's in the dictionary, hence, you are wrong. Your initial argument, again, was that irregardless is NOT a word, we have proven it is. You changed your argument to what you think is now improper usage. Fine, you have yet to see me type anything that says its usage is really acceptable, or not.
And, just to tie that up, I wasn't making a point above using the word irregardless, it was using it to tell what word we were discussing.
Out of me, you & Hank? Maybe. Just google the word & you will see that it is very controversial, actually.
"Your initial argument, again, was that irregardless is NOT a word, we have proven it is. You changed your argument to what you think is now improper usage."
I said the other day that it was the illogical nature of the word that I had the problem with.
My "initial arguement' started here: http://www.muchosucko.com/show/the_ten_types_of_republicans-50178/kind/video
"I wasn't making a point above using the word irregardless, it was using it to tell what word we were discussing."
Obviously, & I wouldn't make a lame comment about you using the word there. Something that petty would only be done by you or Hank. Just like you keep claiming my initial arguement was that it wasn't a word in existance. Whta a stupid fucking claim, just because I didn't put 'illegitimate' in my first comment. The point I was making was obvious.
"No, its not a real word. Its a word that is used by idiots, & it is totally illogical double negative." - 5 days ago!
That was my "initial argument", you fucking douche. Now grow the fuck up and stop hiding being the ridiculous idea that I changed my argument. That claim is so fucking stupid its unreal.
"No, its not a real word" ---- Uhhhhh, what exactly does that say?
Then, "Its a word that is used by idiots" ---- Ummm now you say it is a word.
Then over on the Claude drinking link:
"Just because it is a word that is used by the mentally limited, like yourself, it doesn't make it correct." --- You yourself now say it is a word, but its usage isn't all that correct. Ok. You are the only one who feels that way about it, so get over it.
My argument all along has been it is a word. My argument ends at the Websters dictionary.
Calling me a 'fucking douche' doesn't help your argument, but only reinforces my initial comment after you called me a geek.
The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the consensus among references is that it is a blend of irrespective and regardless, both of which are commonly accepted standard English words. By blending these words, an illogical word is created. "Since the prefix ir- means 'not' (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means 'without,' irregardless is a double negative."[1]
Irregardless is primarily found in North America, most notably in Boston and surrounding areas, where for instance, it was used in the title of a poetry evening 'irregardless of content' at The Baron of Srebrenica, primarily to keep it in circulation. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, Irregardless was first acknowledged in 1912 by the Wentworth American Dialect Dictionary as originating from western Indiana. Barely a decade later, the usage dispute over irregardless was such that, in 1923, Literary Digest published an article titled "Is There Such a Word as Irregardless in the English Language?"[2]
It's naaat a tuuma.
Kirk...you're a dumb shit. It's a word...just like floopsydoopsydoodlebum is if I repeat it enough times and the cancer spreads. Websters is a shit strain of dictionary...a real weak link in the chain of English language 'progression'. The word is essentially meaningless...and totally illogical. Oranje is correct...you're a moron.
The word isn't in my Oxford Concise...it's naaat a tuuuma. Case closed. Douche. Don't misunderestimate me either you cunt.
It is a word that is used (by idiots), I know that. However it isn't a real word because it's a double negative and makes no sense. That has been my claim all a-fucking-long!
"No, its not a real word" - real word/standard word, whatever.
"Its a word that is used by idiots" - OK, just for you, Ill fill in that gaps that are obviously implied by my point, but you were/are too damn stupid to follow. REVISED: It's a non-standard/illogical/meaningless word that is only used by idiots.
There, do you now understand?
My point has always been the same; that it is a illogical meaningless word that is, unfortunately, used be people who are unaware that it has no meaning. Especially not the meaning in which it is intended.
People do not understand that the prefix 'ir' renders the entire word meaningless.
Now don't waste your time by saying I changed my point again, I clearly said the illogical nature of the word is my problem from the very begining.
You are too stupid to follow that it is in the dictionary, which is my problem from the beginning. It doesn't matter whether or not its usage is unacceptable, its there. Accept it.
And since you can't make your point without demeaning people, your own stupidity is getting in the way of what I have said all along. Dictionary. EoS.
Websters...very crap US dictionary that is best used as a door stop...versus the Oxford Concise...an excellent publication from the experts at the University of Oxford - arguably the highest seat of learning on Earth with many of its combined colleges dating over 500 years in age. Hmmm. Yeah, let's go with Websters.
I know it is in the crappy online dictionaries. It is followed in said 'dictionaries' by the point that it is illogical and non standard.
"It has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term."
See for yourself - http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irregardless
If you also believe the word to be meaningless and choose not to use it for that reason, but have been solely arguing that it is 'in the dictionary', you have been wasting your time by making a totally irrelevant point.
The only point I am making is that it is meaningless and only used by idiots.
Hey Cruel, I found it in your great "Oxford Concise" too. Your "British is better than anything" faggotry is just dumb.
Oranje, it is only irrelevant to you. Just because I choose not to use it doesn't make my argument of its existence meaningless. Cocaine exists, is stupid, and I chose not to use it.
No, I haven't, although I have heard about it. My friend asked me about something which I assume is the same advert. He was told about it at work then told me. Something about going internally and showing the ribs puncturing his internal organs.
We do have the best adverts. Can you imaging that one with the girls getting hit by the car, all broken bones, then dragged back into the middle of the road being shown in the US. Slow down to 30 and you wouldn't have fucked her up...quite as much! haha
Oh why, oh why do you insist on repeating the same old 'its in the dictionary' dross? I have just shown you what the dictionaries think of the word, & its lack of meaning and value.
Simple question: Do you think irregarless (not in spite of), makes sense, or has any place in a sentence?
Trailer parks frown on them huh? And, I don't believe for a single nanosecond that you possess an oxford Concise...if you did, why on Earth would you refer to Websters for your correct English wording and usage? Fucking dipshit.
Irregardless is a word that has meaning as long as both speaker and listener agree to that meaning. There are likely entire regions or cities where irregardless is the standard usage and to say that everyone there using irregardless is dumb or poorly educated is obviously a ridiculous assertion.
Yeah, yeah. That's right. Like the sound your wife makes when she's cumming...you just never get to hear it coz you're never there when it happens. The best you've managed from her is the occasional queef...irregardless of your best efforts.
Ahh, I see how this works now. Brilliant word.
Awww, come on man. That's weak. Straight in there with the momma thing huh?
I won't sit here and big-up my bedroom skills, since I have no insecurities. You guys are so blatant to me. Hank, you're getting weaker by the post dude.
Oh shit, take the high ground. Whatever, fag. You've put out plenty of momma jokes, momma's boy, so suck it up just like you nursed until you were 15. And, who's bigging up the bedroom skills? You seemed curious about what a real sex life was like, so I told you. What is blatant, is your dire need to be impaled on another man's cock, pin cuchion.
gay level orange...shut your teenage face you old world monkey...you can't possibly think you're fooling anyone ..you're outsmarted ..outfunnied and pwned on a regular basis
Oh, I'm a frat boy now huh? Shit, I'm like an ever-evolving Pokemon or something. What am I gonna be tomorrow? A community college flunky who rides horses and looks like a reject from Spinal Tap's 'Find an aging hippy' reality show.
Being friends with CreamyBowelMovement would be like having a case of the runs while listening to the soundtrack of a bad bollywood movie at maximum volume.
I wasn't attempting to 'insult' you two (I see you come as a special offer twinpack now). I was merely pointing out something very obvious. Shit. I may have to post something soon. Maybe a pic of my beautiful face...so you can both feel even more humbled and insecure.
It's ben 'fun' as always. I gotta go do some grocery shopping now, in the lovely British weather. Tata for now...fucking bargain-basement, generic, clearance item 'men'.
Hank? If I was bigging them up I'd go further, and provide greater detail. I just kept it very concise. Brevity is good...where it's appropriate. I'm outtie for a few.
Hope you two cunts are dead when I return.
Lol @ dik making fun of Cruel's education.. It's even funnier knowing that dik never even graduated high school, and considers pwning noobs 101 an honors course.. King of mucho-world = fail in real world.. :D
Sorry. I seem to be overlooking the part where you think you owned me on this thread dik...or indeed any other thread any time here...ever. In fact, you and your co-pilot Hank keep attempting it all the time...and failing all the time. I merely stated a fact...I graduated in Oct 1998 with a high 2:1 honours degree in law and politics, and finished second in my graduating law class. Just facts...not bigging anything up. Then you said I'm not a graduate. Add...fact...coz then everyone would believe you. Oranje, possum, and occasionally rish are the only people I consider moderately witty on a regular basis. Dik and Hank have somehow deludely proclaimed themselves witty and/or intelligent. Whereas in fact they are dull, old, predictable, and unoriginal. I speak only facts...fact.
That reminded me of when I was in the Navy. I was an electronics tech. and my div. was in charge of the antenna that was the highest point of the ship on the main mast. (It was my equipment, actually.)
Anyways, when we had a noob in the division and were leaving port, we would say, "Oh, shit! Did you forget to lower the TACAN antenna!" like it would hit on a bridge we were passing under, and the noob would fly into a panic and run to the room. We even had a dummy switch on the equipment labeled Antenna, raise / lower.
It's an (semi)funny story. If you ever get a women/or some friends to listen to your stories, you will regret having lived in the shadows and been such a spineless loser. If you hadn't been, you might have some stories to tell them.
Comments to We're so fukd
wrestle!!!
I'll lick the mud off your monkey if you lick the mud off mine. Never mind. Let's pet each other!!!
MONKEY LICKIN!!!!!
what more could a man ask for?
A little background music to set the mood.
An MG ZT-T ?
A broad with a brain pan?
A tow?
Now they just have to take off their tank tops because it's so "hot" then wrestle to try to rip off each others jean shorts.
this really makes me wanna be a redneck...
Welcome.
Those jean shorts are having all the fun.
*jorts*
They would be if they were with me.
Wish I could check out the mudflaps.
I'd like to drive up their old dirt roads.
Weak. And if I'm not in your next pic, i'm gonna cut your hairy balls off.
Why wait? I'm right here. Step. Wassup? WASSUP? YEEah...dat's what I thought...
Cruel, whats your address so Claude can come fight you?
There's no address for a cardboard box.
No, you're the poor one remember nerdbot. Isn't that right Rish? And Claude. Yes, you are a pussy, but I'll still fuck you up, and make you cough up pube balls for days.
Irish knows all about coughing up pube balls.
you try way too hard Cruel
Wrong! Actually, I don't try at all here. That's the beauty of it. Now die please.
urkelbot is the poor one, no doubt.
Oranje, is that supposed to be an insult? Did you not know that chicks have pubes too, or has it just been so long since you've seen a vag you forgot?
Just educating people on the dangers of deepthroating strangers.
I've been thinking your avatar was a pic of a box of period pills.
Whats so unusual about this?
The fact that Land Rovers never get stuck.
They should have built a Jeep.
Landrovers>Jeeps
As if
At least they actually bother to put doors on a Landy when you buy one.
Doors are for pussies.
landrover is now owned by an indian company tar tar or something
Yeah...I heard they make adult diapers too...go get some Mr Poopypants. Jesus. Yak shoulda banned you too for being the biggest pussy on Earth. You bring shame on Mucho by your presence here.
The mud helps to cool their raw herpes breakout.
welp nothing much to do now but wrestle and make out.
This is a good opportunity.What does Mucho drive?
I'll start with an 06 Jeep Wrangler.
02 mustang gt and a 07 durango
Yugo GV Plus . No, not really. But funny, though.
A tricycle?
A bike, not motor, just a regular bike.
a seatless unicycle
6.8L v-10 Excursion
5.8L v-8 F-250
^USS Enterprise NCC-1701
which one?
Geek
Pompus British Asshole.
Actually...it's 'pompous'. I would proffer that he's not what you suggest, but, paradoxically, you are rather ill-educated, and quite dull of mind.
Pompus? I appreciate the Freudian slippage that went into that - since Aussie bastards refer to us as 'poms' and the infected emanation on a Brit's face would indeed amount to 'pom pus'.
Oh, and why the capitals Professor Prickbrain?
Hes just pissed because I told him irregardless isn't a proper word.
Will you be pissed when I remind you to use apostrophes consistently?
I'm sorry. I didn't know you two were elected Mucho spelling police.
Oh, and since I didn't read CruelFag's comment, I'll assume it was something to do with my spelling indscretion. So, with that, fuck off.
OranjeJuiceJones, you didn't tell me anything. You are still wrong, nobody cares how you 'feel' about irregardless.
Fail. ^
The 1st-grade, last-class mental aikido of some people here is becoming so blatant, telling, and telegraphed that it's just not funny anymore.
Fail at what cuntbag?
OranjeJuiceJones?
Are you really now doing Hanks name thing; badly?
I don't 'feel' anything, I KNOW that irregardless means 'not in spite of'.
If you think that makes sense, it is you who is wrong.
OranjeJuiceJones, look it up.
Your 'knowing' what you feel. As I said before, you are the only one who is annoyed by its usage. But, as I say again, it's in the dictionary, hence, you are wrong. Your initial argument, again, was that irregardless is NOT a word, we have proven it is. You changed your argument to what you think is now improper usage. Fine, you have yet to see me type anything that says its usage is really acceptable, or not.
And, just to tie that up, I wasn't making a point above using the word irregardless, it was using it to tell what word we were discussing.
"Only one who is annoyed"
Out of me, you & Hank? Maybe. Just google the word & you will see that it is very controversial, actually.
"Your initial argument, again, was that irregardless is NOT a word, we have proven it is. You changed your argument to what you think is now improper usage."
I said the other day that it was the illogical nature of the word that I had the problem with.
My "initial arguement' started here: http://www.muchosucko.com/show/the_ten_types_of_republicans-50178/kind/video
"I wasn't making a point above using the word irregardless, it was using it to tell what word we were discussing."
Obviously, & I wouldn't make a lame comment about you using the word there. Something that petty would only be done by you or Hank. Just like you keep claiming my initial arguement was that it wasn't a word in existance. Whta a stupid fucking claim, just because I didn't put 'illegitimate' in my first comment. The point I was making was obvious.
"No, its not a real word. Its a word that is used by idiots, & it is totally illogical double negative." - 5 days ago!
That was my "initial argument", you fucking douche. Now grow the fuck up and stop hiding being the ridiculous idea that I changed my argument. That claim is so fucking stupid its unreal.
Funny, I was just gonna cut and paste that.
"No, its not a real word" ---- Uhhhhh, what exactly does that say?
Then, "Its a word that is used by idiots" ---- Ummm now you say it is a word.
Then over on the Claude drinking link:
"Just because it is a word that is used by the mentally limited, like yourself, it doesn't make it correct." --- You yourself now say it is a word, but its usage isn't all that correct. Ok. You are the only one who feels that way about it, so get over it.
My argument all along has been it is a word. My argument ends at the Websters dictionary.
Calling me a 'fucking douche' doesn't help your argument, but only reinforces my initial comment after you called me a geek.
Oh, and just for clarity, it isn't a word that I actually use as its form isn't all that great.
Origin
The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the consensus among references is that it is a blend of irrespective and regardless, both of which are commonly accepted standard English words. By blending these words, an illogical word is created. "Since the prefix ir- means 'not' (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means 'without,' irregardless is a double negative."[1]
Irregardless is primarily found in North America, most notably in Boston and surrounding areas, where for instance, it was used in the title of a poetry evening 'irregardless of content' at The Baron of Srebrenica, primarily to keep it in circulation. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, Irregardless was first acknowledged in 1912 by the Wentworth American Dialect Dictionary as originating from western Indiana. Barely a decade later, the usage dispute over irregardless was such that, in 1923, Literary Digest published an article titled "Is There Such a Word as Irregardless in the English Language?"[2]
It's naaat a tuuma.
Kirk...you're a dumb shit. It's a word...just like floopsydoopsydoodlebum is if I repeat it enough times and the cancer spreads. Websters is a shit strain of dictionary...a real weak link in the chain of English language 'progression'. The word is essentially meaningless...and totally illogical. Oranje is correct...you're a moron.
The word isn't in my Oxford Concise...it's naaat a tuuuma. Case closed. Douche. Don't misunderestimate me either you cunt.
It is a word that is used (by idiots), I know that. However it isn't a real word because it's a double negative and makes no sense. That has been my claim all a-fucking-long!
"No, its not a real word" - real word/standard word, whatever.
"Its a word that is used by idiots" - OK, just for you, Ill fill in that gaps that are obviously implied by my point, but you were/are too damn stupid to follow. REVISED: It's a non-standard/illogical/meaningless word that is only used by idiots.
There, do you now understand?
My point has always been the same; that it is a illogical meaningless word that is, unfortunately, used be people who are unaware that it has no meaning. Especially not the meaning in which it is intended.
People do not understand that the prefix 'ir' renders the entire word meaningless.
Now don't waste your time by saying I changed my point again, I clearly said the illogical nature of the word is my problem from the very begining.
Ignoring whatever Cruel typed,
You are too stupid to follow that it is in the dictionary, which is my problem from the beginning. It doesn't matter whether or not its usage is unacceptable, its there. Accept it.
And since you can't make your point without demeaning people, your own stupidity is getting in the way of what I have said all along. Dictionary. EoS.
Websters...very crap US dictionary that is best used as a door stop...versus the Oxford Concise...an excellent publication from the experts at the University of Oxford - arguably the highest seat of learning on Earth with many of its combined colleges dating over 500 years in age. Hmmm. Yeah, let's go with Websters.
I know it is in the crappy online dictionaries. It is followed in said 'dictionaries' by the point that it is illogical and non standard.
"It has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term."
See for yourself - http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irregardless
If you also believe the word to be meaningless and choose not to use it for that reason, but have been solely arguing that it is 'in the dictionary', you have been wasting your time by making a totally irrelevant point.
The only point I am making is that it is meaningless and only used by idiots.
Btw Oranje...have you seen that new 'Think' commercial thing...telling us all to use our seatbelts? Chilling...and Muchoworthy.
Hey Cruel, I found it in your great "Oxford Concise" too. Your "British is better than anything" faggotry is just dumb.
Oranje, it is only irrelevant to you. Just because I choose not to use it doesn't make my argument of its existence meaningless. Cocaine exists, is stupid, and I chose not to use it.
No, I haven't, although I have heard about it. My friend asked me about something which I assume is the same advert. He was told about it at work then told me. Something about going internally and showing the ribs puncturing his internal organs.
We do have the best adverts. Can you imaging that one with the girls getting hit by the car, all broken bones, then dragged back into the middle of the road being shown in the US. Slow down to 30 and you wouldn't have fucked her up...quite as much! haha
Irregardless of all that, shut up!
Oh why, oh why do you insist on repeating the same old 'its in the dictionary' dross? I have just shown you what the dictionaries think of the word, & its lack of meaning and value.
Simple question: Do you think irregarless (not in spite of), makes sense, or has any place in a sentence?
Why oh why do you insist on not understanding that my statement was simply that it is there, regardless of what they say about it?
Simple Answer: Already given. I don't (as far as I know) use the word.
I KNOW ITS IN THE FUCKING DICTIONARIES (as a misused, meaningless word), I DON'T NEED YOU TO POINT THAT OUT FOR FUCK SAKE!!!
I would never sit on the fence like you do. I just couldn't do it.
There you go then. Twas all I was saying.
Nobody asked you to sit on the fence, and certainly not my fence, as I don't have any in my yard. They aren't allowed.
Trailer parks frown on them huh? And, I don't believe for a single nanosecond that you possess an oxford Concise...if you did, why on Earth would you refer to Websters for your correct English wording and usage? Fucking dipshit.
Im not asking if you use it or not.After all, there are plenty of legitimate words I don't use, like decidophobia.
Do you think that irregardless makes sense.
Try looking it up on the internet, fuckwad. The COD is out there, readily available. Now who is the dipshit?
Irregardless is a word that has meaning as long as both speaker and listener agree to that meaning. There are likely entire regions or cities where irregardless is the standard usage and to say that everyone there using irregardless is dumb or poorly educated is obviously a ridiculous assertion.
^ Ill settle for that. It can be used like a code word, other than that, it makes no sense.
irregardless of anything you lot are all dumbasses
Irregardless makes sense. Everyone knows what it means when they hear it.
Yeah, yeah. That's right. Like the sound your wife makes when she's cumming...you just never get to hear it coz you're never there when it happens. The best you've managed from her is the occasional queef...irregardless of your best efforts.
Ahh, I see how this works now. Brilliant word.
My wife would never cheat, for one. For two, when we have sex, she comes 2 or 3 times to my one.
I suppose you are just basing that on your own experience in disappointing women, starting with your mother.
Awww, come on man. That's weak. Straight in there with the momma thing huh?
I won't sit here and big-up my bedroom skills, since I have no insecurities. You guys are so blatant to me. Hank, you're getting weaker by the post dude.
Oh shit, take the high ground. Whatever, fag. You've put out plenty of momma jokes, momma's boy, so suck it up just like you nursed until you were 15. And, who's bigging up the bedroom skills? You seemed curious about what a real sex life was like, so I told you. What is blatant, is your dire need to be impaled on another man's cock, pin cuchion.
he really brings up the gayness
*cushion, as in you get pushed in, CrustyBM.
gay level orange...shut your teenage face you old world monkey...you can't possibly think you're fooling anyone ..you're outsmarted ..outfunnied and pwned on a regular basis
Fucking hell. You two are like the even less funny Mork and Mindy. Go 'edit' your stale 'Mucho joke/phrase book'.
i would also like to add that I am stronger and more virile than you. i have slept with many prostitutes ,the least expensive being your mother.
Just weak dik. You know it too. You have less material and originality than a 30 year old taupe sweater.
i got nothing
hey look cruelhn lets be friends ok?
^now that original
i never meant that stuff i said before about being so yappy and dumb...i'm sorry
just kidding
fuck you cruel you redlight district crossdressing mommies boy
Allow me to pre-empt the inevitable.
Fuck you dik.
i have something inevitable in my pants you might want to pre-empt frat boy
awww hell i'm funnin with you cruel i don't mean it man
just kidding i do mean it
Oh, I'm a frat boy now huh? Shit, I'm like an ever-evolving Pokemon or something. What am I gonna be tomorrow? A community college flunky who rides horses and looks like a reject from Spinal Tap's 'Find an aging hippy' reality show.
Being friends with CreamyBowelMovement would be like having a case of the runs while listening to the soundtrack of a bad bollywood movie at maximum volume.
ooo the frat boy comment stung didn't it college boy? any pep rallys coming up? hahaha
Oh and yeah dik...you were right for once. The tiny, penis in training that flipped out your fly was truly inevitable...alas. :(
homework done? you better clean the microwave popcorn out of your teeth before you talk..
Hank? You just captured all my dreams in one image there.
is he saying he wants to suck my cock?
Oh, and I left college over 10 years ago Wurzel. I'm old...but not as old (or dumb and unattractive) as you two. Mmmk?
boooring
Haha, I notice you didn't say graduated. Must be a dropout.
that's what you're going to say to insult us ...we're old and ugly...ouch that really really stings..well i feel totally pwned i guess you win
Law and Politics, Oct 1998. Graduated second in Law school. Thanks.
Oh, bigging up the academic credentials. You must be very insecure.
I wasn't attempting to 'insult' you two (I see you come as a special offer twinpack now). I was merely pointing out something very obvious. Shit. I may have to post something soon. Maybe a pic of my beautiful face...so you can both feel even more humbled and insecure.
It's ben 'fun' as always. I gotta go do some grocery shopping now, in the lovely British weather. Tata for now...fucking bargain-basement, generic, clearance item 'men'.
Hank? If I was bigging them up I'd go further, and provide greater detail. I just kept it very concise. Brevity is good...where it's appropriate. I'm outtie for a few.
Hope you two cunts are dead when I return.
very insecure and if i was to guess that might have been what he wanted but he's no graduate
you're a pathetic college boy cruel..your grades are shit and so are your lies...who do you think you're trying to fool ?
Haha, don't leave angry, just leave.
Btw, DroolingHomo, I love the 'arbitrary' quotation marks there. They really add 'emphasis', you fucking cancerous, surgically removed top bollock.
he sounds upset...look man we're just having fun ,joking around ..trying to make you feel welcome
just kidding
Hank? Dik? CrustyBollock?
What is with the name and the question mark? Are you sure you were second in your junior high debate class?
he didn't even say bye. what a prick
i wonder why he's so mean
i thought we had just made a real step toward friendship there...judges?
That guy has bad manners.
i'll tell you what he is..a big jerk that's what..so insensitive
You remember when I posted my address, dik? Nobody did shit.
I won't post my address again, but if anyone want my phone number, just let me know. I'll be glad to tell you to go fuck yourself.
well i'll gladly post my number it's 212 631 1194...ask for dik
Is this thread worth reading?
I noticed a bunvh of CruelHM and Oranjemoob comments and don't want to waste time unless its funny or something.
Lol @ dik making fun of Cruel's education.. It's even funnier knowing that dik never even graduated high school, and considers pwning noobs 101 an honors course.. King of mucho-world = fail in real world.. :D
would you like a pwnage yourself?
i can make you look like a fool too if you like
He does that all by himself.
notice he said i was king and not you hank..that has to hurt
Its not a humours thread Irish, its more educational than anything else.
You should probably steer well clear of it.
I am obviously the KING!
hank = lamest piece of shit on this site...
an even more prestigious award...
:D
Irish is the Queen.
I have something educational you need to read, Oranje.
http://www.ehow.com/how_3063_brush-teeth.html
Sorry Irish, I couldn't quite make that out. Come out of the closet and it will be a little clearer.
Hi, CockStore, do you want to be my friend?
Most of my friends are pieces of shit anyway... why not..?
Sorry. I seem to be overlooking the part where you think you owned me on this thread dik...or indeed any other thread any time here...ever. In fact, you and your co-pilot Hank keep attempting it all the time...and failing all the time. I merely stated a fact...I graduated in Oct 1998 with a high 2:1 honours degree in law and politics, and finished second in my graduating law class. Just facts...not bigging anything up. Then you said I'm not a graduate. Add...fact...coz then everyone would believe you. Oranje, possum, and occasionally rish are the only people I consider moderately witty on a regular basis. Dik and Hank have somehow deludely proclaimed themselves witty and/or intelligent. Whereas in fact they are dull, old, predictable, and unoriginal. I speak only facts...fact.
Oh look! Captain Paragraph's back.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
haha jesus
Facts are for pussys.
Are you still up Hanky ? what time is it in Japan ?
the flux capasitor needs a boost from the fantasmagorgle device and that should get them going again.
i think the sub auxillary squiffit is jammed on the front of conglomeration and it'll take a left handed monkey wrench to fix it
That reminded me of when I was in the Navy. I was an electronics tech. and my div. was in charge of the antenna that was the highest point of the ship on the main mast. (It was my equipment, actually.)
Anyways, when we had a noob in the division and were leaving port, we would say, "Oh, shit! Did you forget to lower the TACAN antenna!" like it would hit on a bridge we were passing under, and the noob would fly into a panic and run to the room. We even had a dummy switch on the equipment labeled Antenna, raise / lower.
It was good for a laugh.
Nice act of self-fellatio. Your wife is good for a laugh too. Tell her to clean next time I pound her with a Kirin Beer bag on her head.
It's an (semi)funny story. If you ever get a women/or some friends to listen to your stories, you will regret having lived in the shadows and been such a spineless loser. If you hadn't been, you might have some stories to tell them.
if you shoved a ho under each tire you'd get the car out
If I shoved a ho under yo face...you'd probably marry it.
are you trying to upset me? do you really think you can bother me?
you'll have to try harder than that
The double-post would tend to suggest you are indeed a little aggravated by my comment. Basic psychology.
Faggot!
So what's the verdict, dik...you gonna marry Cruex's mom, or what?
her name is cheech
So, you're my mom now possum? Hmmm. How odd.
look, i thought we had this all settled - i am always "chong" and never "cheech"...jeez
Possum say: It's a peach...
So tight you'll need a winch to get the tampon out.